Disarmament is a tricky process. Germany was, in many senses, disarmed between the world wars - that didn't end too well (World War II). The list of nations that have successfully dabbled (armed, not just researched), peaceably disarmed, and then integrated into international community norms is short. You could make the case for South Africa, but its disarmament was tied to significant sanctions because of apartheid. It was apartheid's end that really brought South Africa within norms. You may say Libya; however, similar sanctions decimated the entire economy (and the energy industry in particular). In addition, Libya under Gaddafi still came toppling down years later. Three former Soviet states inherited WMD (Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine), but all returned them, having no ability to maintain them long-term and limited capacity to use them. Iraq? Well, that went south years later. No great example exists.
In many senses, Syria is a test case. What will be the effect on Assad's government? How will this affect the Syrian Civil War? What implications exist for the greater Middle East? These are all unknowns that rest on the progress of the chemical disarmament.
Previous Illexum Posts on Syria:
- Unthinkable? No. Unprecedented? No. Ignored. Yes. - Syria Today (September 5, 2013)
- UN good at counting; everything else - not so much (June 13, 2013)
- Foreign Arms in Syria (June 2, 2013)
- Can't Trust Anyone (in Syria) (May 19, 2013)
- The Chorus Grows Louder: Syria & WMD (April 28, 2013)
- Raise Your Hand if You Saw Chemical Weapons (March 21, 2013)
- Annan Resigns, Endgame Approaches? (August 2, 2012)
No comments:
Post a Comment